I am not a writer, nor would I ever
consider myself as one. However, today I am writing, as I will call it, “The
Outsider”, for I feel nothing more or less than such. I am an outsider in a way
that which everyone surrounding me seems to understand and relate, while I am a
cast in the shadows attempting to slip off half of the mask. The past weeks
have been ones of exploration and searching of the soul but the results are some
of disappointment while others achievement. New York City is a world of comfort;
hence it is a place where I feel the opportunity of choice. New York City is
one to be in the bones, where its experience is of pure confidence, which masks
the ultimate bliss. I, now in Paris, have yet to experience this confidence
that masks bliss but rather bliss that masks confidence. Eugene Lang of New
York City is pure freedom while Parsons of Paris has been, to me at least so
far, claustrophobic. This claustrophobia, caused by minute selection of courses
and opportunity, feels as if there is no freedom of choice, and is one of my
reasoning’s of feeling as the outsider.
Henry James was the author of the
past week reading and it was as alien to me as Paris itself, for I have never
read in such ways that he writes. Henry James has a style of complication. His
literary style of realism is more of one of dense, poetic symbolism- one that
deranges my mind in grasping. There is a connection to the writing style of
James and of Hemingway, for they produce on paper life through their
perception. Despite this comparison, Hemingway’s style is more of simplistic
and direct, but also extremely visual. James too, is visual but his optical is
one of philosophic. Yet, the two approach ways in identifying not just life,
but life in Paris.
As mentioned earlier, the results
since my arrival in Paris have been ones of disappointment and achievement.
Achievements have made their way in bombarding my life of the new. Places, art,
food, people, language, architecture, and way of living- it is all new. New is
of one that excites me the most. But what is this disappointment? There seems
to be a dark hole that is lying beneath this electric flesh that is barricading
what should have been the confidence and bliss that was expected. Maybe it is
the act of expecting. Although with only twenty years of life, it has occurred
to me when one abides by the act of prediction, negative or positive, the
aftermath always fails to triumph.
Now, this pessimism shouldn’t and
does not relate to Paris itself, for the city is full of beauty, and when one
is cornered by beauty, happiness occurs. It is not that there is no happiness
being felt, for it is confidence that is being lacked, and when one lacks
confidence, one lacks independence. As I am writing this, the root of the
problem has finally become clear in its path. It is fear. The dark hole lying
beneath my electric flesh is fear. Is it possible that it is the fear that
fears me? Is it fear that is holding back the light that was prepared to take
advantage of every opportunity of the new this city has to offer? What if it is
fear of the new, fear of letting go of what was once convenient and now being
forced to appreciate the excruciating awkwardness? What is ironic about this current state is
that this was the reasoning of leaving New York City, a place that is so
familiar now being thousands of miles away.
Fear, disappointment, discomfort,
are what swarm my body when I am placed in a situation where I feel as if I do
not understand, do not belong. This is true in the case that it is intimidating
to attempt to speak French because I do not, although know enough and could easily
put sentences together, but instead stick to English and still feel as a fool.
This is also why going out alone, other than places familiar, has not happened
yet. My disappointment now is the equivalent of lack of confidence and
independence. This is so when reading, for example, Henry James; one whose
literary style appears unfamiliar, is difficult to understand, and requires
full consideration. Feeling as a fool. This is yet another that falls under the
genre of my disappointment, even a subgenre of my fear. But maybe this is the
reasoning of coming to Paris, to learn not to feel as a fool even when wrong or
clueless. What is wrong with being wrong or clueless? It is impossible to be
correct and knowledgeable of everything, right? These are things, which need to
become an acceptance and a closure, for, and then confidence and independence
will be regained and the outsider will be diminished.